I tested InterpretBank’s auto-suggest during a 90-minute energy roundtable in Bogotá last Thursday (Zoom with KUDO relay), and while the acronym hits were great, the pop-ups nudged my ear–voice span by about half a second. How are you tuning alerts or screen layout to keep real-time accuracy without losing cultural nuance when the panel pivots to sensitive issues?
I bump the trigger to 4 chars and cap suggestions at 3, then park the popup bottom‑right so it’s out of my main gaze; that’s kept my “ear–voice span” steady while still catching acronyms… When it turns sensitive, I toggle auto-suggest off for a few minutes and lean on a pinned note with vetted euphemisms — more fog lights than high beams. Do you mute it for Q&A or keep it live?
And i limit auto‑suggest to the active glossary and exact matches only, and I bound a ‘hold-to-hide’ hotkey (Space via AutoHotkey) that mutes popups for about 10s when the discussion gets sensitive, which keeps my ‘ear–voice span’ steady. I also drop opacity a notch and anchor the panel just above the KUDO video so it stays in peripheral vision. Do you get fewer false positives if you toggle off fuzzy matches?
, those pop-ups add a tiny lag for me too; in Zoom/KUDO relays I push InterpretBank to a tablet via spacedesk and keep only acronyms and names pinned in Booth view, so the suggestion box isn’t vying with the speaker video when the talk turns sensitive. Building on @sophia_m92, I bound a foot pedal to toggle predictions entirely for 20–30 seconds, which feels less fussy than a thumb hotkey mid-pivot. If you were on a single screen in Bogotá for those 90 minutes, moving IB off the main display makes a surprising difference.